PEP Screening

PEP Screening helps identify risks when dealing with politically exposed persons (PEPs), who may be linked to corruption, money laundering, or tax evasion. Regular PEP screening reduces potential legal and financial exposure.

PEP Screening Explained: Detect Risks and Compliance Issues

PEP screening is an essential part of corporate risk control, as it helps organizations identify and manage potential exposure to political influence or corruption. In this context, business relationships with politically exposed persons (PEPs) — whether customers, suppliers, or employees — require increased diligence and attention. Therefore, to reliably identify potential PEPs in existing as well as future relationships, companies should conduct regular PEP screenings. In contrast to sanction lists, it is legally permissible to maintain business relationships with individuals listed as PEPs. Nevertheless, such relationships carry a higher risk of potential compliance violations and should therefore be monitored closely.

Identifying PEPs can be complex. For this reason, many companies now rely on specialized providers that systematically research PEPs and their relatives, and subsequently compile structured lists. These comprehensive datasets can then be checked individually or alternatively integrated automatically into business processes in order to minimize risks effectively and consistently.

In particular, Info4c AG provides the PEPs listed in CYC, which currently include more than one million PEPs and their family members. As a result, organizations can enhance transparency, streamline compliance workflows, and ultimately strengthen their overall risk management framework.

Who are Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs)?

The definition of politically exposed persons (PEPs) is outlined in the 4th EU Anti-Money Laundering Directive and § 1 (12) of the Money Laundering Act (GwG). Individuals are considered PEPs if they currently hold, or have held within the past 12 months (§ 15 (7) GwG), a significant public position, whether in their own country or abroad.
But why does holding a public position matter when determining PEP status?

PEPs occupy influential roles and are therefore considered at higher risk for corruption and money laundering. They often have access to government funds and can influence decisions that determine which companies receive lucrative contracts. As a result, they may become involved in activities such as bribery, money laundering, tax evasion, or even terrorism financing.

Moreover, PEP status extends beyond the individual. Immediate family members are also classified as PEPs, as they can similarly benefit from or influence these positions. This group includes spouses, registered partners, children and their spouses, parents, and siblings.

Individuals Considered PEPs under EU Law

  • Heads of state, government leaders, ministers, deputy ministers, and state secretaries

  • Members of parliament or similar legislative bodies

  • Members of political party executive boards

  • Members of the supreme, constitutional, or other high courts whose decisions, except in extraordinary cases, are final

  • Members of audit offices or central bank governing bodies

  • Ambassadors, chargés d’affaires, and senior military officers

  • Members of state-owned enterprise management or supervisory boards

  • Directors or deputies of executive bodies in international organizations

Family Members include

  • Spouses or equivalent partners of PEPs

  • Children and their spouses or equivalents

  • Parents of PEPs

Closely Associated Persons include

  • Natural persons who are joint owners with a PEP of legal entities or arrangements, or who maintain close business ties with a PEP

  • Individuals who are the sole beneficial owners of a legal entity created for the benefit of a PEP

If a public position is not national-level, the person is still considered a PEP if their role is equivalent in scope to a similar national-level position.

The Need for PEP Screening

Because PEPs hold influential positions, they are particularly vulnerable to financial crimes. Historical examples show politicians exploiting their roles for personal gain, accepting bribes, influencing contract awards, and laundering illicit funds.

If a company unknowingly engages with a PEP with a criminal record, it may face law enforcement investigations. In less severe cases, reputational damage may occur; in more severe cases, criminal sanctions such as fines may be applied. Companies that perform irregular or partial PEP screenings expose themselves to unnecessary economic risk.

Due Diligence Check tool for KYC / AML checks

How to Handle a Positive PEP Screening

A PEP match signals increased money laundering risk. After the investigation, it must therefore be reported to the authorities; otherwise, failure may result in regulatory consequences.

Although identifying a PEP raises awareness of potential risk, it does not necessarily require the termination of a business relationship. The individual may not have committed any crimes, nor does their status mean they will do so in the future. Nevertheless, companies should therefore implement strong risk management measures as well as enhanced due diligence procedures, which include the following:

  • Regular personal meetings with the PEP

  • Thorough investigation of all transactions, and

  • In-depth analysis of their business and personal environment

Moreover, PEPs are legally required to cooperate and to provide complete information, including the source of their funds. If cooperation is insufficient or incomplete, then companies should reassess the relationship and possibly consider terminating it.

In addition, because transparency is essential, a suspicion report should be filed if necessary. Furthermore, such reports are required whenever financial irregularities occur or if any other alarming information arises during the course of the business relationship. Consequently, institutions must remain vigilant and ensure consistent monitoring at all times.

Implementing PEP screening successfully with CYC

Failing to regularly screen business contacts for PEP status constitutes gross negligence. Transactions with PEPs, knowingly or unknowingly, expose companies to criminal sanctions. Manual checks against constantly changing PEP and sanction lists are time-consuming and prone to error.

CYC Compliance Check simplifies this process by enabling manual or automated screening of all business partners. With regularly updated PEP lists, CYC reduces workload, ensures no entries are missed, and lets companies focus on their core business.

RESTful API service